Options for Addressing Spousal Support in Relationship Agreements
/Options for Addressing Spousal Support in Relationship Agreements
Spousal support is often the most emotionally charged and least understood part of a prenuptial or marital agreement. Many couples avoid the topic entirely, only to discover later that silence is still a choice, just one that hands control to the law in effect at the time of divorce.
There are generally three ways couples approach spousal support in relationship agreements. Each comes with different tradeoffs around predictability, flexibility, and risk.
1. Say Nothing and Rely on the Law
One option is to leave spousal support unaddressed. If the relationship ends, support will be determined under the laws of the jurisdiction where the divorce takes place.
This approach can feel simpler up front, but it carries real uncertainty. Spousal support rules vary widely from state to state, and even within the same state, the law can change significantly over time. What feels fair or predictable today may look very different ten or twenty years from now, especially if income, health, or family structure changes.
Choosing silence effectively means opting into an unknown future legal framework.
2. Create Your Own Rules
Many couples prefer to define their own spousal support framework rather than relying on default laws. This does not mean predicting every possible future scenario. It means agreeing on principles and guardrails that reflect shared values and realistic expectations.
Common approaches include tying support to the length of the marriage, with different outcomes for shorter versus longer marriages. Others incorporate specific life events or conditions, such as having children, stepping out of the workforce, disability, or reaching certain asset or income thresholds.
Some agreements place durational limits on support, while others use formulas to create predictability, such as a percentage-based calculation or a split of net spendable income. In some cases, couples agree to a buyout of spousal support. This can work well, but it needs to be structured carefully to avoid enforceability issues, including concerns that one party is financially incentivized to divorce.
The key benefit of this approach is intentionality. The rules are tailored to the couple, rather than imposed later by a court.
3. Complete Waiver of Spousal Support
A third option is a full waiver of spousal support. This is most appropriate where the underlying facts support it and where both parties are comfortable with the risk allocation.
Waivers are often based on existing wealth, such as where both parties have substantial assets, or where each party has independent and comparable financial security. In other cases, a waiver may be appropriate when earning capacities are similar and expected to remain so.
Because courts scrutinize spousal support waivers closely, especially in long-term marriages, the reasoning behind the waiver matters. A well-drafted agreement explains why the waiver is fair at the time it is signed, not just what the waiver says.
Choosing the Right Approach
There is no single right answer. The best spousal support provision is one that matches the couple’s actual financial dynamics, anticipated life paths, and tolerance for uncertainty. What matters most is not avoiding the conversation, but having it thoughtfully and with eyes open to the long-term consequences.
If you want help thinking through which framework aligns with your situation, that conversation often reveals far more about values and expectations than the legal clause itself.